{"id":1450,"date":"2023-10-02T23:27:59","date_gmt":"2023-10-03T03:27:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newssprinters.com\/index.php\/sport\/ranking-133-college-football-teams-after-week-5-georgias-close-calls-open-door-for-new-no-1\/02\/10\/2023\/"},"modified":"2023-10-02T23:27:59","modified_gmt":"2023-10-03T03:27:59","slug":"ranking-133-college-football-teams-after-week-5-georgias-close-calls-open-door-for-new-no-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newssprinters.com\/index.php\/sport\/ranking-133-college-football-teams-after-week-5-georgias-close-calls-open-door-for-new-no-1\/02\/10\/2023\/","title":{"rendered":"Ranking 133 college football teams after Week 5: Georgia\u2019s close calls open door for new No. 1"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n<\/p>\n

\n

Sign up for the Until Saturday newsletter<\/strong> | Jayna Bardahl and The Athletic<\/em>\u2019s college football staff deliver expert analysis on the biggest CFB stories five days per week. Get it sent to your inbox.<\/a><\/p>\n\n

It\u2019s been a while since we\u2019ve had a season without a clear-cut No. 1 team this deep into the fall.<\/p>\n

Several teams can make a case, and there are still many big games to be played. But at this point, it\u2019s time for a change. Texas<\/a> is the new No. 1 in this week\u2019s Athletic 133.<\/p>\n

There are two reasons for it. The first is Texas itself. The Longhorns went to Alabama and handled the Crimson Tide<\/a> in what is the most impressive single win of the season. Texas also took care of business with blowouts of Baylor<\/a> and Kansas<\/a> in the last two weeks. Yes, Texas had a brief scare against Wyoming<\/a>, but the other teams in the top four have each had a scare against an inferior team as well. The Longhorns have played like the best team in the country<\/a> and have a marquee win. That\u2019s good for No. 1.<\/p>\n

The second reason is Georgia<\/a>. We\u2019re almost halfway through the season, and these slow starts can\u2019t be ignored anymore<\/a>. The Bulldogs trailed South Carolina<\/a> at halftime and needed a second-half comeback to beat an Auburn<\/a> team that was pushed around by Texas A&M last week and barely escaped Cal. Georgia hasn\u2019t lost, but the Dawgs don\u2019t have a notable win, unlike Texas (Alabama), Ohio State<\/a> (Notre Dame<\/a>) and Florida State<\/a> (LSU<\/a>, Clemson<\/a>). Sagarin ranks Georgia\u2019s schedule strength at 130th nationally. It\u2019s not that<\/em> bad, but nothing Georgia has done this year is worth a No. 1 ranking at this point compared to other teams.<\/p>\n

Now, believing in Texas might be famous last words for one week. The Longhorns play Oklahoma<\/a> in Dallas this Saturday. If they win, we might see everyone else come around and rank Texas at No. 1. But I\u2019m making the move now. If the Longhorns lose, well, that\u2019s what I get for thinking Texas has turned a corner. These rankings aren\u2019t meant to be predictive. They\u2019re based solely on what has been accomplished, and thus far, Texas deserves that spot.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
<\/div>\n
\n

GO DEEPER<\/p>\n

Behind the AP Top 25 ballot: Why I moved Texas to No. 1 over Georgia<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Here is this week\u2019s Athletic 133.<\/p>\n

1-10<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Outside of Texas and Georgia, the other notable move in this group is USC<\/a>. The Trojans<\/a> get jumped by Oregon<\/a> on account of their results against common opponent Colorado<\/a>, and by Notre Dame after the Irish rallied to beat Duke<\/a> in the final seconds. USC now sits at No. 10.<\/p>\n

Florida State and Ohio State were both idle, while Oregon and Washington<\/a> are both off this coming week before playing each other in Seattle on Oct. 14 in a massive game. Michigan<\/a> finally dominated an opponent (Nebraska<\/a>) from start to finish like it should, but again, the Wolverines are going to just float around in these rankings until they play a notable opponent (Penn State<\/a> on Nov. 11) or the teams ahead of them drop games. It\u2019s the same as Georgia. The Bulldogs just started higher. Both teams have played very easy schedules, making their rankings basically irrelevant for now. They have the talent to win the national championship. They just don\u2019t have the resume yet.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\"go-deeper\"\/<\/div>\n
\n

GO DEEPER<\/p>\n

How good is Washington? After a sizzling start, the Huskies got tested Saturday<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

11-25<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Maybe Alabama has figured some things out? The Crimson Tide have rebounded from the scare at USF with multi-score wins against Ole Miss<\/a> and Mississippi State<\/a>, and they move up to No. 11. Oklahoma continues to look dominant but hasn\u2019t played anyone of note yet, so the Sooners sit behind North Carolina<\/a> and Washington State<\/a>. We\u2019ll get a good read on Oklahoma against Texas this Saturday.<\/p>\n

Duke was one fourth-and-long stop away from beating Notre Dame, so the Blue Devils only fall one spot to No. 15. Oregon State<\/a> rises ahead of Utah<\/a> up to No. 17 after beating the shorthanded Utes on Friday night. Ole Miss dropped out of the top 25 after losing to Alabama, but the Rebels are back in at No. 20 after their wild 55-49 win against LSU<\/a>, which falls to No. 24.<\/p>\n

Maryland<\/a> and Kentucky<\/a>, both 5-0, have moved into the top 25. The Wildcats sit slightly ahead at No. 21 thanks to the win against Florida<\/a> this weekend. Texas A&M also slides in at No. 25. The Aggies<\/a> may have figured things out since Max Johnson<\/a> became quarterback, with consecutive wins against Auburn and Arkansas<\/a>.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\"go-deeper\"\/<\/div>\n
\n

GO DEEPER<\/p>\n

Auerbach’s Top 10: Week 5 leaves some contenders sweating more than others<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

26-50<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Rank<\/span><\/th>\nTeam<\/span><\/th>\nRecord<\/span><\/th>\nPrev<\/span><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
\n

26<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

22<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

27<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

27<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

28<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

21<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

29<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

29<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

30<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

31<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

5-0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

34<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

32<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

24<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

33<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

31<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

34<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

32<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

35<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

5-0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

37<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

36<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

5-0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

46<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

37<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

5-0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

48<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

38<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

41<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

39<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

49<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

40<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

25<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

41<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

44<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

42<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

47<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

43<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

36<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

44<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-1<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

52<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

45<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

4-0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

55<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

46<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

45<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

47<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

38<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

48<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

2-3<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

39<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

49<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

50<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

50<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n\n

3-2<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

40<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div><\/div>\n

Kansas falls just out of the top 25 after its 26-point loss to Texas because it didn\u2019t have quarterback Jalon Daniels<\/a>. Florida only remains in the top 30 for now by virtue of its win against Tennessee<\/a>. Louisville<\/a> is 5-0 but still outside the top 25 due to a weak schedule and close calls against Georgia Tech<\/a> and Indiana<\/a>. A home game this Saturday against Notre Dame will give us a true read on the Cardinals. Colorado only falls to No. 32 after rallying to within seven of USC late. The Buffs have a lot of problems, but they can still score.<\/p>\n

Tulane<\/a> remains the top Group of 5 team (No. 34) after a comeback win against UAB<\/a>, but undefeated Fresno State<\/a>, James Madison<\/a> and Air Force<\/a> are right on the heels of the Green Wave. Fresno State\u2019s game against Wyoming this week is a big one that could boost the Bulldogs into the top 25.<\/p>\n

51-75<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Arkansas and Mississippi State fall out of the top 50 after lopsided losses to Texas A&M and Alabama, respectively. Troy got back on track with a dominant win against previously undefeated Georgia State<\/a> and moves up to No. 54. One week after comfortably beating Wake Forest<\/a>, Georgia Tech lost to Bowling Green<\/a>, making the Yellow Jackets a difficult team to place. They are now down to No. 61.<\/p>\n

USF has beaten Rice<\/a> and Navy<\/a> since its narrow loss against Alabama, and the Bulls<\/a> rise up to No. 65. Texas State<\/a> is 4-1 and ninth nationally in scoring, and the Bobcats are up to No. 66. Michigan State<\/a> allowed 26 points to Iowa but just one offensive touchdown, which is a pretty typical way to lose to Iowa these days. Purdue<\/a> handled Illinois<\/a> 44-19 in a stunning final score; the Boilermakers move up to No. 57 and Illinois falls to No. 72, remaining ahead of Toledo<\/a> for now because of its head-to-head win. Miami<\/a> (Ohio<\/a>) and UNLV<\/a> are both 4-1 and squeeze into the top 75 as teams to keep an eye on in their respective conferences.<\/p>\n

76-100<\/h2>\n

Baylor scored 29 points in the final 19 minutes to come back and beat UCF<\/a> 36-35 and move up to No. 79. The Bears remain behind UTSA<\/a> for now due to their loss to common opponent Texas State. San Diego State<\/a> has lost four in a row, including 49-10 to Air Force on Saturday, and continues to tumble down to No. 83. Virginia Tech<\/a> got a much-needed 38-21 win against Pitt<\/a> to jump up to No. 87.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\"go-deeper\"\/<\/div>\n
\n

GO DEEPER<\/p>\n

Saturday Superlatives: Top Week 5 highlights, from Ole Miss-LSU to Caleb Williams<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

101-133<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Bowling Green, which was blown out by Ohio a week ago, beat Georgia Tech 38-27 to jump up to No. 101. Stanford<\/a> drops into this group at No. 102 after a 42-6 loss to Oregon. ULM remains at No. 103 after Appalachian State<\/a> needed a 54-yard field goal as time expired to beat the Warhawks<\/a>. Virginia<\/a> is now the lowest-ranked Power 5 at No. 104 after losing to Boston College<\/a>, which previously held the title.<\/p>\n

Arkansas State<\/a>, which was No. 133 after Week 2, has won three games in a row and is up to No. 113 after beating UMass<\/a>. Sam Houston nearly notched its first FBS win but allowed a late Jacksonville State<\/a> touchdown drive and lost in overtime. Buffalo beat Akron<\/a> for its first win to get out of the bottom spot, and the new No. 133 is Nevada, which is now on a 15-game losing streak.<\/p>\n

The Athletic 133 Rankings series is part of a partnership with AllState. <\/em>The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.<\/em><\/p>\n

(Photo: Kevin C. Cox \/ Getty Images)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n