\n<\/p>\n
Oscar Pistorius, the South African athlete hailed as an inspirational figure until he was accused and convicted of killing his girlfriend, was expected to be released on parole on Friday after seven years in prison.<\/p>\n
Mr. Pistorius was granted parole in November on the basis that he had served half of a 15-year sentence for murder. In 2013, Mr. Pistorius shot his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, through a locked bathroom door before dawn, killing her.<\/p>\n
The court case drew global headlines and intense interest: Mr. Pistorius, a double amputee, had gained international acclaim first as a Paralympic athlete, and then for competing in the Olympic Games, and Ms. Steenkamp was a model and reality star. The trial spanned seven months and was televised. Audiences watched as Mr. Pistorius sobbed in a South African courtroom and heard the testimony of almost 40 witnesses.<\/p>\n
This week, the South African authorities emphasized that Mr. Pistorius\u2019s \u201celevated public profile\u201d would not afford him any special treatment. The Department of Correctional Services declined to disclose the time of his departure from prison. The authorities also forbade Mr. Pistorius from speaking to reporters, in line with regulations restricting media interactions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u201cInmates and parolees are never paraded,\u201d the department said in a statement.<\/p>\n
Mr. Pistorius will be under parole supervision until 2029, when his sentence officially ends. Now 37, he is expected to live with his family, and must remain in Pretoria, South Africa\u2019s administrative capital. He must also attend rehabilitation programs and is barred from consuming alcohol or any banned substances, the department said.<\/p>\n
While the parole decision fell within South Africa\u2019s incarceration regulations, some groups said his freedom had come too soon. Ahead of Mr. Pistorius\u2019s release, a gender rights group that highlights South Africa\u2019s high rates of violence against women resurfaced some of the evidence used against Mr. Pistorius during his trial. The group, Women for Change, created an image of a text message from Ms. Steenkamp to Mr. Pistorius, which the prosecution used as evidence during the trial.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m scared of you sometimes, of how you snap at me,\u201d the message read.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\u201cOscar Pistorius is a murderer and he belongs behind bars to serve his full sentence,\u201d the group said on social media. <\/span>Last year, Women for Change also publicly opposed Mr. Pistorius\u2019s parole bid.<\/p>\n The message on social media was \u201cto serve as a reminder to society of who Oscar was,\u201d said Bulelwa Adonis, a spokeswoman for the group.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Mr. Pistorius\u2019s release on parole followed a tortuous legal case that began in 2013, after the shooting in the early hours of Valentine\u2019s Day 2013. That morning, Mr. Pistorius shot Ms. Steenkamp through a locked bathroom door at his home in an upscale Pretoria security estate.<\/p>\n Mr. Pistorius maintained that her death was an accident, and that he mistook her for an intruder. Prosecutors argued that he had killed Ms. Steenkamp in a jealous rage after an argument, pointing to her text messages as evidence of a volatile relationship.<\/p>\n Mr. Pistorius was initially convicted of manslaughter, but prosecutors appealed, and his conviction was upgraded to murder. An appeals court increased his sentence from six to 15 years, the minimum recommended by South African law for unpremeditated murder.<\/p>\n In March, a parole board denied his bid, saying the authorities had incorrectly credited him with having served the minimum required period of detention. Mr. Pistorius\u2019s lawyers took up the decision with the Constitutional Court, South Africa\u2019s highest decision-making body, and it ruled in his favor, citing a misinterpretation of when Mr. Pistorius\u2019s sentence for murder began.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n At first, the Steenkamp family opposed his bid for parole, on the grounds that they believed Mr. Pistorius deliberately killed their daughter. Last year, Ms. Steenkamp’s mother, June Steenkamp, did not oppose Mr. Pistorius\u2019s parole bid, but publicly questioned whether he was truly rehabilitated.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Before his conviction, Mr. Pistorius was lauded for his domination as a Paralympic athlete \u2014 he was born without fibulas, so doctors amputated his legs before his first birthday \u2014 and for his determination to compete beyond Paralympic events. Nicknamed the Blade Runner for the carbon fiber prosthetic blades he used to run, Mr. Pistorius also had a slew of lucrative endorsements.<\/p>\n