\n<\/p>\n
Blood coursed through the streets of Rwanda\u2019s capital, Kigali, in April 1994 as machete-wielding militiamen began a campaign of genocide that killed as many as 800,000 people, one of the great horrors of the late 20th century.<\/p>\n
Thirty years later, Kigali is the envy of Africa. Smooth streets curl past gleaming towers that hold banks, luxury hotels and tech startups. There is a Volkswagen car plant and an mRNA vaccine facility<\/a>. A 10,000-seat arena hosts Africa\u2019s biggest basketball league and concerts by stars like Kendrick Lamar, the American rapper, who performed there in December.<\/p>\n Tourists fly in to visit Rwanda\u2019s famed gorillas. Government officials from other African countries arrive for lessons in good governance. The electricity is reliable. Traffic cops do not solicit bribes. Violence is rare.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n The architect of this stunning transformation, President Paul Kagame, achieved it with harsh methods that would normally attract international condemnation. Opponents are jailed, free speech is curtailed and critics often die in murky circumstances, even those living in the West. Mr. Kagame\u2019s soldiers have been accused of massacre and plunder in the neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n For decades, Western leaders have looked past Mr. Kagame\u2019s abuses. Some have expressed guilt for their failure<\/a> to halt the genocide, when Hutu extremists massacred people mostly from Mr. Kagame\u2019s Tutsi ethnic group. Rwanda\u2019s tragic history makes it an \u201cimmensely special case<\/a>,\u201d Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, once said.<\/p>\n Mr. Kagame will commemorate the 30th anniversary of the genocide on Sunday, when he is expected to lay wreaths at mass graves, light a flame of remembrance and deliver a solemn speech that may well reinforce his message of exceptionalism. \u201cNever again,\u201d he often says.<\/p>\n But the anniversary is also a sharp reminder that Mr. Kagame, 66, has been in power for just as long. He won the last presidential election with 99 percent of votes. The outcome of the next one, scheduled for July, is in little doubt. Under Rwanda\u2019s Constitution, he could rule for another decade.<\/p>\n The milepost has given new ammunition to critics who say that Mr. Kagame\u2019s repressive tactics, previously seen as necessary \u2014 even by critics \u2014 to stabilize Rwanda after the genocide, increasingly appear to be a way for him to entrench his iron rule.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Questions are also growing about where he is leading his country. Although he claims to have effectively banished ethnicity from Rwanda, critics \u2014 including diplomats, former government officials and many other Rwandans \u2014 say he presides over a system that is shaped by unspoken ethnic cleavages that make the prospect of genuine reconciliation seem as distant as ever.<\/p>\n A spokeswoman for Rwanda\u2019s government did not respond to questions for this article. The authorities declined accreditation to me to enter the country. A second Times reporter has been allowed in.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Ethnic Tutsis dominate the top echelons of Mr. Kagame\u2019s government, while the Hutus who make up 85 percent of the population remain excluded from true power, critics say. It is a sign that ethnic division, despite surface appearances, is still very much a factor in the way Rwanda is ruled.<\/p>\n \u201cThe Kagame regime is creating the very conditions that cause political violence in our country,\u201d Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza, his most prominent political opponent, said by phone from Kigali. \u201cLack of democracy, absence of rule of law, social and political exclusion \u2014 it\u2019s the same problems we had before.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Ms. Ingabire, a Hutu, returned to Rwanda from exile in 2010 to run against Mr. Kagame for president. She was arrested, barred from taking part in the election and later imprisoned on charges of conspiracy and terrorism. Released in 2018, when Mr. Kagame pardoned her, Ms. Ingabire cannot travel abroad and is barred from standing in the election in July.<\/p>\n \u201cI agree with those who say Rwanda needed a strongman ruler after the genocide, to bring order in our country, \u201d she said. \u201cBut today, after 30 years, we need strong institutions more than we need strong men.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Mr. Kagame burst into power in July 1994, sweeping into Kigali at the head of a Tutsi-dominated rebel group, the Rwandan Patriotic Front, which ousted the Hutu extremists who orchestrated the genocide. Randy Strash, a worker with the aid agency World Vision, arrived a few weeks later to find a \u201cghost town.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cNo gas stations, no stores, no communications,\u201d he recalled. \u201cAbandoned vehicles by the side of the road, riddled with bullets. At night, the sound of gunshots and hand grenades. It was something else.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Mr. Strash set up his tent across the street from a camp where Mr. Kagame was quartered. Hutu fighters attacked the camp several times, trying to kill Mr. Kagame, Mr. Strash said. But it was not until a decade later, at an event at the University of Washington, that he met the Rwandan leader in person.<\/p>\n \u201cVery polite and reasonable in his responses,\u201d Mr. Strash recalled. \u201cClear, thoughtful and thought-provoking.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Historical documents released by Human Rights Watch<\/a> this week show how much U.S. leaders knew about the slaughter as it unfolded. Writing to President Bill Clinton on May 16, 1994, the researcher Alison Des Forges urged him<\/a> \u201cto protect these defenseless civilians from murderous militia.\u201d<\/p>\n Since coming to power, Mr. Kagame has had a reputation for spending aid wisely and promoting forward-looking economic policies. Although former aides have accused him of manipulating official statistics<\/a> to exaggerate progress, Rwanda\u2019s trajectory is impressive: Average life expectancy rose to 66 years from 40 years between 1994 and 2021, the United Nations says.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n One of Mr. Kagame\u2019s first acts was to publicly erase the dangerous divisions that had fueled the genocide. He banned the terms Hutu and Tutsi from identity cards and effectively criminalized public discussion of ethnicity<\/a>. \u201cWe are all Rwandan\u201d became the national motto.<\/p>\n But in reality, ethnicity continued to suffuse nearly every aspect of life, reinforced by Mr. Kagame\u2019s policies. \u201cEveryone knows who is who,\u201d said Joseph Sebarenzi, a Tutsi who served as the president of Rwanda\u2019s Parliament until 2000, when he fled into exile.<\/p>\n A survey published<\/a> last year by Filip Reyntjens, a Belgian professor and outspoken Kagame critic, found that 82 percent of 199 top government positions were held by ethnic Tutsi \u2014 and nearly 100 percent in Mr. Kagame\u2019s office. American diplomats reached a similar conclusion in 2008, after conducting their own survey of Rwanda\u2019s power structure.<\/p>\n Mr. Kagame \u201cmust begin to share authority with Hutus to a much greater degree\u201d if his country were to surmount the divides of the genocide, the U.S. Embassy wrote in a cable<\/a> that was later published by WikiLeaks.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Critics accuse Mr. Kagame of using the memory of the events of 1994 to suppress the Hutu majority.<\/p>\n Official commemorations mention \u201cthe genocide of the Tutsi\u201d but play down or ignore the tens of thousands of moderate Hutus who were also killed, often trying to save their Tutsi neighbors.<\/p>\n A perception of selective justice rubs salt into those wounds. Mr. Kagame\u2019s troops killed 25,000 to 45,000 people, mostly Hutu civilians, from April to August 1994, according to disputed U.N. findings<\/a>. Yet fewer than 40 of his officers have been tried for those crimes, according to Human Rights Watch.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n The Hutu killings are incomparable in scale or nature to the genocide. But Mr. Kagame\u2019s lopsided approach to dealing with those events is hampering Rwandans\u2019 ability to reconcile and move on, critics say.<\/p>\n \u201cAnyone not familiar with Rwanda might think that everything is fine,\u201d Mr. Sebarenzi said. \u201cPeople work together, they go to church together, they do business together. That is good. But under the carpet, those ethnic divisions are still there.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Although Mr. Kagame has appointed Hutus to senior positions in government since 1994, including prime minister and defense minister, those appointees have little real power, said Omar Khalfan, a former official with Rwanda\u2019s national intelligence service who fled into exile in the United States in 2015.<\/p>\n Tutsi loyalists are planted in the offices of senior Hutus to keep an eye on them, said Mr. Khalfan, a Tutsi. \u201cThe regime doesn\u2019t want to speak about ethnicity because it raises the issue of power-sharing,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd they don\u2019t want that.\u201d<\/p>\n In the West, Mr. Kagame is a firm favorite at gatherings of the global elite such as the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, where he met with President Volodymyr Zelensky<\/a> of Ukraine in January. But at home, those who publicly challenge him risk arrest, torture or death.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n A decade ago, Kizito Mihigo, a charismatic gospel singer, was among Rwanda\u2019s most popular artists. A Tutsi who lost his parents in the genocide, Mr. Mihigo often sang at genocide commemorations and was said to be close to Mr. Kagame\u2019s wife, Jeannette.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n But on the 20th anniversary, Mr. Mihigo released a song that in coded lyrics called on Rwandans to show empathy for both Tutsi and Hutu victims \u2014 effectively, a call for greater reconciliation.<\/p>\n Mr. Kagame was furious. A presidential aide said he \u201cdidn\u2019t like my song, and that I should ask him for forgiveness,\u201d Mr. Mihigo recalled in 2016<\/a>. If the singer refused to comply, he added, \u201cthey said I\u2019d be dead.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr. Mihigo apologized but was convicted on treason charges and imprisoned. Released four years later, he found he was blacklisted as a singer. In 2020, he was arrested again as he tried to slip across the border to Burundi and, four days later, found dead in a police station.<\/p>\n The government said Mr. Mihigo had taken his life, but few believed it. \u201cHe was a very strong Christian who believed in God,\u201d said Ms. Ingabire, the opposition politician, who came to know Mr. Mihigo in prison. \u201cI can\u2019t believe this is true.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr. Kagame\u2019s reach extends across the globe. Rights groups have documented dozens of cases<\/a> of Rwandan exiles being intimidated, attacked or assassinated by presumed agents of the state in at least a dozen countries, including Canada<\/a>, Australia<\/a> and South Africa<\/a>.<\/p>\n Mr. Khalfan, the former intelligence officer, said he was approached at home in Ohio in 2019 by a man he identified as an undercover Rwandan agent. The man tried to lure him to Dubai \u2014 a similar ruse to the one that caused Paul Rusesabagina<\/a>, a Hutu hotelier whose story featured in the movie \u201cHotel Rwanda,\u201d to be tricked into returning to the country in 2020.<\/p>\n Mr. Rusesabagina was released<\/a> from prison last year,<\/a> after years of U.S. pressure. The episode only underscored how little real resistance Mr. Kagame faces at home. But a more immediate worry lies across the border<\/a>, in eastern Congo.<\/p>\n There, the United States and the United Nations have publicly accused Rwanda of sending troops and missiles in support of M23, a notorious rebel group that swept across the territory in recent months, causing widespread displacement and suffering. The M23 has long been seen as a Rwandan proxy force in Congo, where Mr. Kagame\u2019s troops have been accused of plundering rare minerals and massacring civilians. Rwanda denies the charges.<\/p>\n The crisis has cooled Mr. Kagame\u2019s relations with the United States, his largest foreign donor, American officials say. Senior Biden administration officials traveled to Rwanda<\/a>, Congo and, more discreetly, Tanzania in recent months in an effort to prevent the crisis from spiraling into a regional war. In August, the United States imposed sanctions on a senior Rwandan military commander for his role in backing the M23<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n U.S. officials described tense, sometimes confrontational meetings between Mr. Kagame and senior American officials, including the U.S.A.I.D. administrator, Samantha Power, over Rwanda\u2019s role in eastern Congo.<\/p>\n Mr. Kagame has often denied that Rwandan troops are in Congo, but he appeared to tacitly admit the opposite in a recent interview with Jeune Afrique magazine<\/a>.<\/p>\n In justifying their presence, he fell back on familiar logic: that he was acting to prevent a second genocide, this time against the ethnic Tutsi population in eastern Congo.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Arafat Mugabo contributed reporting.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n