\n<\/p>\n
The cease-fires in Gaza and Lebanon will most likely hold for now, despite being tested to their limits over the weekend, because all sides want to avoid full-scale fighting at least for a few weeks, analysts said.<\/p>\n
In southern Lebanon, Israeli troops remained in position<\/a> past the deadline on Sunday for their withdrawal, amid Israeli claims that Hezbollah had broken its own pledge to leave the area. In Gaza, Hamas failed to release a female hostage whom Israel had hoped would be freed on Saturday, prompting Israel to delay the agreed return<\/a> of displaced Palestinians to their homes in northern Gaza.<\/p>\n But even as each side accused the other of reneging on their deals, analysts said, both Israel and its opponents had reasons to remain flexible and temporarily overlook the other\u2019s transgressions.<\/p>\n Hezbollah, though angry at Israel for keeping troops in southern Lebanon, would risk a devastating Israeli counterattack if it renews its rocket strikes on Israeli cities. Hamas wants to retain power in Gaza and risks losing it if war returns. And Israel needs to maintain the current arrangement in Gaza long enough to free at least two dozen more hostages. Israeli leaders have also appeared eager to placate President Trump, who campaigned on a promise to keep peace<\/a> in the Middle East.<\/p>\n Illustrating their desire to prolong the Gaza truce, Israel and Hamas seemed to resolve the weekend\u2019s crisis close to midnight on Sunday. The government of Qatar, a mediator between the sides, said that the female hostage, Arbel Yehud<\/a>, would be freed this week along with two others who would be released ahead of schedule. In return, Israel said that it would allow displaced Palestinians to return to northern Gaza<\/a> on Monday morning.<\/p>\n As for Lebanon, the White House announced<\/a> that the truce there would be extended until Feb. 18, though there was no immediate comment from Israel or Hezbollah. The Lebanese prime minister\u2019s office confirmed the extension.<\/p>\n Aaron David Miller, a former U.S. negotiator in Middle East peace talks, said, \u201cThey\u2019re going to get through the next few weeks \u2014 beyond that is anyone\u2019s guess.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThese are not agreements between the United States and Switzerland. They\u2019re agreements that depend on each side giving the other a certain discretion and margin for maneuver,\u201d he added. \u201cThat is their weakness, but also their strength.\u201d<\/p>\n That wriggle room ultimately allowed both truces to survive the weekend, even as Israeli troops shot and killed people in both Lebanon and Gaza<\/a> who were trying to return to areas still controlled by Israel.<\/p>\n The Lebanese Health Ministry said that 22 people had been killed by Israeli fire in southern Lebanon, and the Palestinian Authority\u2019s news agency said that one person had been killed in Gaza as large crowds in both places gathered near Israeli troops, demanding to go home.<\/p>\n But by Monday morning, the standoff in Gaza appeared set to ease. In Lebanon, Hezbollah issued a statement praising the residents attempting to return and calling on foreign powers to force Israel to withdraw. But Hezbollah did not resume its rocket fire.<\/p>\n Analysts say that Hezbollah is unlikely to risk further losses while its leadership is decimated and its benefactor, Iran, is weakened. Also, the group\u2019s main arms supply route, through Syria, was blocked in December when the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad, an ally of Hezbollah, was ousted by rebels<\/a>.<\/p>\n Hezbollah\u2019s commanders do \u201cstill have some rockets, they have some guns, they can do something,\u201d said Hanin Ghaddar, a Lebanese analyst at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a foreign affairs research group.<\/p>\n \u201cBut it\u2019s suicidal if they do this, because they know that any kind of attack by Hezbollah in Israel means that Israel will take the opportunity to come back full blast and annihilate whatever is left of them,\u201d Ms. Ghaddar added.<\/p>\n Hezbollah is also probably wary of losing support among its Shiite Muslim base, particularly in next year\u2019s parliamentary elections, Ms. Ghaddar said. Lebanon\u2019s Shiite community paid the largest price for Hezbollah\u2019s decision to go to war with Israel<\/a> in October 2023 in solidarity with its ally Hamas. Shiite villages and towns in southern Lebanon bore the brunt<\/a> of Israel\u2019s ensuing air campaign and ground invasion.<\/p>\n \u201cIf the Shia do not vote for them, this is the end of Hezbollah,\u201d said Ms. Ghaddar, the author of a book about Hezbollah\u2019s relationship with its base. \u201cThey cannot really do anything if they don\u2019t know 100 percent that the Shia community is going to support it.\u201d<\/p>\n Because Hezbollah is less likely to resume fighting, the Gaza cease-fire is considered the frailest of the two truces.<\/p>\n But its biggest stress test is not expected until the beginning of March, when Hamas and Israel must decide whether to extend the arrangement beyond an initial 42-day truce.<\/p>\n For now, Israel has signaled it wants to maintain the cease-fire to sustain the flow of hostage releases. But an extension would require both sides to agree to a permanent end to the war \u2014 a bridge that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has appeared unwilling to cross. Mr. Netanyahu\u2019s coalition government relies on far-right lawmakers who seek permanent Israeli control of Gaza, and his administration could collapse if the war ends with Hamas still in charge.<\/p>\n The terms of the agreement allow for some flexibility. The truce can continue beyond the 42-day mark as long as both sides remain negotiating about whether to make the arrangement permanent.<\/p>\n But Israeli officials say they will not remain locked in endlessly fruitless negotiations, especially if Hamas stops releasing hostages. And Hamas is unlikely to keep freeing the hostages, its main bargaining chip, without an Israeli promise to cease hostilities permanently.<\/p>\n \u201cHamas wants a cease-fire but not at all costs,\u201d said Mkhaimar Abusada, a Palestinian political scientist from Gaza. \u201cThey want a cease-fire that ends the war.\u201d<\/p>\n Much could depend on President Trump\u2019s willingness to cajole Mr. Netanyahu toward a more lasting truce. Mr. Trump\u2019s private messages to the Israeli prime minister were crucial to the forging of the initial phase, but it remains to be seen whether the American president will maintain that position beyond a few weeks.<\/p>\n \u201cIf Netanyahu succeeds in convincing Trump of the need to renew the war, there\u2019ll probably be a renewal of the war,\u201d Mr. Abusada said. \u201cIf Trump keeps his promise that he doesn\u2019t want any wars and he wants more peace \u2014 whether it\u2019s in Gaza, Ukraine or all over the world \u2014 that\u2019s a different thing.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n