\n<\/p>\n
The Trump factor is shaping global politics, one election at a time \u2014 just not necessarily to the president\u2019s taste.<\/p>\n
In major votes in Canada and Australia over the past two weeks, centrists saw their fortunes revived, while parties that had borrowed from the MAGA playbook lost out.<\/p>\n
President Trump has been back in power for only three months, but already his policies, including imposing tariffs and upending alliances, have rippled into domestic political battles around the world.<\/p>\n
While it is too soon to say that anti-Trump forces are on the rise globally, it is clear that voters have Mr. Trump somewhere on their mind as they make decisions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Canada and Australia share a lot in common: a political system, a major mining industry, a sovereign in King Charles. Now they also share a remarkable political story.<\/p>\n
In both countries, before Mr. Trump was inaugurated, the center-left ruling parties had been in poor shape and appeared poised to lose power. The front-runners in polls were the conservative parties, whose leaders flirted with Trumpian politics both in style and in substance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Within weeks following Mr. Trump\u2019s return to power, the Canadian and Australian political scenarios flipped in the same way: The center-left incumbents surged ahead of the conservative oppositions, and went on to win. And both countries\u2019 conservative leaders lost not just the elections \u2014 they even lost their own seats in Parliament.<\/p>\n
Canada\u2019s prime minister, Mark Carney, campaigned on an explicitly anti-Trump message, putting the American president\u2019s threats to Canada at the heart of his campaign. Australia\u2019s leader, Anthony Albanese did not. But both men got an anti-Trump bump.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Conservative leaders faced a scathing rejection at the ballot box. Pierre Poilievre, the head of the Canadian conservatives, and Peter Dutton, the leader of those in Australia, struggled to shake off a damaging association with Mr. Trump.<\/p>\n
Mr. Dutton had walked back or moderated some Trumpian policy proposals when they proved to be unpopular, like radically slashing the public sector work force. Mr. Poilievre never really pivoted away from the Trump approach, even after the American president threatened Canada\u2019s sovereignty.<\/p>\n
Charles Edel, the Australia chair at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank, called the election in Australia a \u201cblowout.\u201d And he suggested that it had resulted, at least in part, because of Mr. Trump\u2019s implicit intrusion into the election, even if it had been mostly focused on domestic issues.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere were enough similarities to the Canadian election to suggest that the conservatives\u2019 fortunes fell as Trump\u2019s tariffs and attacks on America\u2019s allies ramped up,\u201d he wrote in an email.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
In Canada, some saw the Australian election result as a sign of solidarity from their cousins to the far south. \u201cAlbo Up!\u201d an online meme said, swapping Mr. Albanese\u2019s nickname into Mr. Carney\u2019s hockey-inspired anti-Trump slogan: \u201cElbows Up!\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Mr. Carney benefited from a perception among voters that he would be a stable hand to manage Mr. Trump and his unpredictable impact on Canada\u2019s economy, which is deeply integrated with America\u2019s and already hurting because of tariffs and uncertainty. His background as an economic policymaker also worked in his favor.<\/p>\n
Across the world, in Singapore, the argument for stability in times of turmoil also appeared to help the incumbent People\u2019s Action Party.<\/p>\n
Last month, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said in Parliament that Singapore would sustain a bigger hit from the new American tariffs because of its reliance on global trade. He called on Singaporeans to brace for more shocks, and predicted slower growth.<\/p>\n
Much like Mr. Carney, who declared the old relationship between Canada and the United States \u201cover,\u201d Mr. Wong issued a gloomy warning ahead of elections. \u201cThe global conditions that enabled Singapore\u2019s success over the past decades may no longer hold,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
On Saturday, voters returned his party to power,<\/a> an outcome that was never in doubt but was still seen as bolstered by the \u201cflight to safety\u201d strategy that the party deployed.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is another case of the Trump effect,\u201d said Cherian George, who has written books about Singaporean politics. \u201cThe sense of deep concern about Trump\u2019s trade wars is driving a decisive number of voters to show strong support for the incumbent.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n In Germany, an important Western ally that was the first to hold a national election after Mr. Trump\u2019s inauguration, the effect of the Trump factor has been less direct, but it has still been felt.<\/p>\n Friedrich Merz, who will be sworn in as Germany\u2019s new chancellor on Tuesday, did not profit politically from Mr. Trump\u2019s election the way leaders in Canada or Australia did in the more recent votes.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n But if Mr. Trump\u2019s confrontation with America\u2019s European allies on defense and trade did not help Mr. Merz before the vote, it has helped him since.<\/p>\n Mr. Merz was able to push through a suspension of spending limits in fiscally austere Germany, which will make his job as chancellor easier. He did so by arguing that the old certainties about American commitment to mutual defense were gone.<\/p>\n \u201cDo you seriously believe that an American government will agree to continue NATO as before?\u201d he asked lawmakers<\/a> in March.<\/p>\n The MAGA-sphere\u2019s embrace of a far-right German party known as the AfD did not help it, according to polls, even though Elon Musk had gone as far as to endorse the party and to appear at one of its events by video stream.<\/p>\n An unpredictable American president can have unpredictable consequences for leaders abroad, as Prime Minister Keir Starmer of Britain is fast discovering.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Mr. Starmer, a center-left leader who won his election before Mr. Trump won his, initially gained praise<\/a> for the businesslike way with which he dealt with the new American president.<\/p>\n Unlike Mr. Carney, Mr. Starmer went out of his way to avoid direct criticism of Mr. Trump, finding common cause with him where possible and seeking to avert a rupture. After a visit to the White House that was deemed successful, even some of Mr. Starmer\u2019s political opponents sounded impressed.<\/p>\n All the while, a Trump ally in Britain, Nigel Farage, leader of the anti-immigration party Reform U.K, was struggling to fend off accusations that he sympathizes with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.<\/p>\n But Mr. Starmer soon ran out of steam after failing to parlay a pleasant White House visit into exemptions from American tariffs on British goods.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Last week, his Labour Party was dealt a significant blow<\/a> when voting took place in regional and other elections in parts of England. It lost 187 council seats as well as a special parliamentary election in one of its strongholds.<\/p>\nMixed impact<\/h2>\n
A British exception<\/h2>\n